Marco
The quad framework: where the economy is, where it is headed, and what wins and loses in each regime.
WHAT IS THE HEAT MAP?
Macro, sectors, bonds, technicals and portfolios — distilled into decisions and updated daily. And we’re just getting started: new portfolios and models are added all the time.
Week of October 23, 2026 · The CIO’s verdict
The long-term trend is still up and the S&P 500 sits above its 10-month average, so we stay invested — but the regime is shifting from Quad 2 toward Quad 3, so the portfolio leans defensive: quality, staples, health care, utilities and gold over rate-sensitive and cyclical risk.
Macro · Marco, Macro Strategist
A quad is one of four macro regimes — every period is sorted by whether growth and inflation are rising or falling.
The friendliest regime — favors stocks broadly, growth names and credit.
Favors commodities, energy, cyclicals and other real assets.
Favors long bonds, gold and quality defensives; hard on cyclicals, commodities and credit.
Favors gold, commodities and defensive sectors; hard on credit.
The markers flag the team’s current read. What each regime rewards in practice is set out under Optimal Positioning, further down this tab.
As of the October 26, 2026 board unless a panel states otherwise.
How to read this:
Stocks pay you nothing extra in current earnings yield over bonds today — the entire case for equities rests on future growth, which is exactly what the base and bull cases above are arguing about.
Grant’s qualitative read, updated weekly — geopolitical temperature: Elevated. Drivers:
The highest since 1997.
Scope:
Market Technicals · Trent, Technical Analyst (CMT)
Price leads fundamentals. The structure of the bull market is intact; the near-term internals say respect the tape, don’t chase it. Readings as of the October 26, 2026 close.
UP
The structural bull market is intact.
UP
50-day average 7,697.46 above the 150-day average 7,443.14.
DOWN
Below the 25-day average of 7,725.78 — a near-term pullback inside the uptrend.
Sources: breadth counts computed by the desk from S&P 500 member closes (Yahoo Finance daily data, October 26, 2026 close; 503 of 504 members tracked — moving-average counts use the 500–502 members with sufficient price history, and highs/lows use the 499 members with a full prior year). $NASI / $NAMO: StockCharts published readings. NYSE advance / decline: as reported by Reuters for the October 26 session.
−786.74 · October 26, 2026
+3.52 · October 26, 2026
Status: ● BULL — price above the 10-month average. A month-end close below the line flips the status to BEAR.
Sectors · Eleven desks
Every desk closes its report with a Strength Score from 0 to 100 — 0–20 broken, 21–40 weak, 41–60 neutral, 61–80 strong, 81–100 exceptional. Tap any desk for its report, score drivers and Timeless 10.
Reading the bar.
How the score is built.
Why Strong can sit in a downtrend.
Style Factors · Saul Rosenberg, Style Factor Strategist
Saul reads which style factors are leading and which are lagging, tracked through the ETFs that hold them.
Fish here: Dividend (HDV +7.9% — the best tracker on the tab this month), Dividend (SCHD +6.3%), Low volatility (USMV +5.2%), MLP & energy infrastructure (MLPX +5.1%), Value (IVE +2.9%), Large-cap equal weight (RSP +2.9%), Health care (PINK +1.7%) and International low-vol high dividend (LVHI +1.6%) — the only trackers up over the month, in a month the S&P 500 (SPY) fell 0.8%.
Do not fish here, for now: AI basket, freedom-weighted EM (FRDM −12.1% — now the worst tracker on the tab), Energy transformation (PWRD −10.1%), Speculative growth (ARKK −9.8%), High beta (SPHB −9.7%), Smart grid (GRID −9.2%), Emerging markets (EEM −9.1%), AI enablers & adopters (ALAI −8.9%), Momentum — US (SPMO −8.1%), Industrial renaissance (AIRR −7.8%), Nasdaq 100 (QQQ −4.3%), Growth (IVW −3.7%) and Mega-cap (XLG −2.5%).
The screen — all four, or it is not on the list:
Screen: 300-brand universe and the 32 factor trackers, adjusted closes and share volume, Yahoo Finance daily data, October 26, 2026 close. A screen is a starting list, not a recommendation. For informational purposes only. This is not financial advice. Please do your own research.
| Style factor | ETF | 1 Month | 3 Months | 6 Months | 12 Months |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reference — S&P 500, cap-weighted | SPY | −0.8% | +2.7% | +7.7% | +14.2% |
| Reference — Nasdaq 100 | QQQ | −4.3% | +3.6% | +7.5% | +16.0% |
| Size — Mega-cap, S&P 500 Top 50 | XLG | −2.5% | +3.4% | +3.8% | +7.6% |
| Size — Mega-cap, S&P 100 | OEF | −1.6% | +3.2% | +8.3% | +13.0% |
| Size — Large-cap, equal-weighted | RSP | +2.9% | +1.4% | +8.4% | +15.4% |
| Size — Mid-cap | IJH | −0.1% | −2.8% | +0.7% | +11.9% |
| Size — Small-cap | IWM | −1.8% | −4.6% | +0.6% | +12.2% |
| Style — Value | IVE | +2.9% | +3.5% | +9.1% | +15.7% |
| Style — Growth | IVW | −3.7% | +2.1% | +6.5% | +12.9% |
| Momentum — US | SPMO | −8.1% | −2.1% | +7.2% | +16.5% |
| Quality — US | SPHQ | −1.6% | −1.1% | +4.0% | +13.4% |
| Multi-factor — Quality + Value + Momentum | QLC | −1.5% | +0.5% | +6.8% | +16.0% |
| Speculative / low quality | ARKK | −9.8% | +14.9% | +7.0% | −8.4% |
| High beta | SPHB | −9.7% | −1.0% | +2.9% | +21.4% |
| Dividend | SCHD | +6.3% | +6.3% | +15.0% | +35.2% |
| Low volatility | USMV | +5.2% | +6.0% | +10.6% | +11.1% |
| International — Developed ex-U.S. | EFA | −2.5% | −2.5% | +2.7% | +12.0% |
| International — Emerging markets | EEM | −9.1% | −3.5% | −2.5% | +14.4% |
| International — Developed ex-U.S. (reference point) | FNDF | −2.0% | −0.4% | +6.0% | +26.3% |
| International — Emerging markets (reference point) | GEM | −8.7% | −3.2% | −1.6% | +15.3% |
| Portfolio — International low-vol high dividend | LVHI | +1.6% | +1.6% | +8.5% | +27.5% |
| Portfolio — High dividend, US | HDV | +7.9% | +6.8% | +15.6% | +29.3% |
| Portfolio — S&P 500 premium income (covered-call overlay) | GPIX | −0.3% | +2.9% | +8.1% | +15.2% |
| Portfolio — MLP & energy infrastructure | MLPX | +5.1% | +0.3% | +6.3% | +33.3% |
| AI power basket — Smart grid infrastructure | GRID | −9.2% | −8.9% | −12.4% | +5.0% |
| AI power basket — Energy transformation | PWRD | −10.1% | −11.4% | −14.1% | −4.9% |
| AI power basket — Technology (also the site’s Tech sector ETF) | XLK | −5.1% | +6.4% | +16.6% | +27.6% |
| AI power basket — Emerging markets, freedom-weighted (trades like the AI basket — see below) | FRDM | −12.1% | −2.6% | +1.1% | +36.6% |
| AI power basket — AI enablers & adopters | ALAI | −8.9% | −0.6% | +7.7% | +15.6% |
| AI power basket — US infrastructure development | PAVE | −2.5% | −7.5% | −6.9% | +8.8% |
| AI power basket — American industrial renaissance | AIRR | −7.8% | −17.3% | −22.0% | −3.1% |
| Health care stability — Health care, actively managed | PINK | +1.7% | +1.9% | +13.3% | +20.8% |
Source: Saul’s Factor Map, October 26, 2026. For informational purposes only. This is not financial advice. Please do your own research.
Selection · How we pick · October 26, 2026 snapshot
| Pair | 1 month | 3 months | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Large (XLG) vs Small (IWM) | −2.5% vs −1.8% | +3.4% vs −4.6% | Large — 3 months is decisive |
| U.S. (SPY) vs Developed ex-U.S. (EFA) | −0.8% vs −2.5% | +2.7% vs −2.5% | U.S. |
| U.S. (SPY) vs Emerging (VWO) | −0.8% vs −6.1% | +2.7% vs −3.6% | U.S. — VWO computed from Yahoo adjusted closes; the site’s EEM proxy reads −9.1% at 1 month, same verdict, different magnitude (FTSE vs MSCI index composition) |
| Value (IWD) vs Growth (IWF) | +2.5% vs −4.2% | +3.0% vs +2.3% | Value — computed from Yahoo adjusted closes; the site’s IVE vs IVW proxies read +2.9% vs −3.7% at 1 month, same verdict |
| Equal weight (RSP) vs Cap weight (SPY) | +2.9% vs −0.8% | +1.4% vs +2.7% | Equal weight on momentum, cap weight on 3 months — tilt equal weight, do not overcommit |
Q4 answer today: U.S., value, large, with an equal-weight tilt.
| Pond | 1-month ETF | Timeless 10 breadth score | Why it is here |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Energy (XLE) | +12.25% | 95.0 | Best 1-month sector and near-perfect Timeless breadth — the Quad 3 trade to harvest, not marry |
| 2. Utilities (XLU) | +7.69% | 55.0 | Defensive plus AI power demand; breadth improved from 5.0 in September |
| 3. Staples (XLP) | +7.19% | 100.0 | Perfect Timeless breadth — 10 of 10 green — and the defensive leg of Q3 |
| Category | Best in breed (3Y Sharpe) | Sharpe | Sortino | Alpha vs SPY (ann.) | Beta | Funnel fit today |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low volatility | USMV | 0.95 | 1.35 | +1.76% | 0.47 | Wanted |
| Dividend | VIG | 1.09 | 1.60 | +1.06% | 0.72 | Wanted — SCHD has the higher alpha (+5.00%) on a slightly lower Sharpe (1.05) |
| Value | IWD | 1.28 | 1.87 | +4.27% | 0.72 | Wanted |
| Growth | IVW | 1.02 | 1.47 | −1.05% | 1.23 | Watch — growth is losing Q4 |
| Equal weight | RSP | 0.94 | 1.39 | −0.21% | 0.78 | Wanted (tilt, not overcommit — see Q4) |
| U.S. large / Mega-cap | OEF | 1.16 | 1.69 | +0.89% | 1.03 | Wanted (core) |
| Developed ex-U.S. | FNDF | 1.21 | 1.76 | +6.14% | 0.72 | Underweight — best in breed, wrong geography today |
| Emerging markets | GEM | 0.81 | 1.16 | +1.10% | 0.86 | Avoid now |
| Small cap | IWM | 0.67 | 0.99 | −4.91% | 1.12 | Avoid now |
| Mid cap | IJH | 0.64 | 0.94 | −5.46% | 0.99 | Watch |
| U.S. momentum | SPMO | 1.22 | 1.77 | +5.26% | 1.26 | Avoid now — 3-year leader, 1-month loser (−8.1%) |
| U.S. quality | QUAL | 1.03 | 1.51 | −0.81% | 0.91 | Watch |
| Multi-factor | QLC | 1.26 | 1.84 | +2.25% | 0.97 | Wanted |
| High beta | SPHB | 0.79 | 1.12 | −5.47% | 1.56 | Avoid now |
| Sector — Energy | XLE | 0.62 | 0.84 | +5.87% | 0.45 | Wanted (pond 1) |
| Sector — Utilities | XLU | 0.74 | 1.05 | +6.23% | 0.33 | Wanted (pond 2) |
| Sector — Staples | XLP | 0.60 | 0.87 | +4.65% | 0.19 | Wanted (pond 3) |
| Sector — Technology | XLK | 0.94 | 1.34 | −1.53% | 1.48 | Watch — sector breadth is cooling |
| Sector — Discretionary | XLY | 0.50 | 0.72 | −9.42% | 1.16 | Watch |
| Sector — Financials | XLF | 1.00 | 1.42 | +3.14% | 0.76 | Watch — breadth improved, momentum middling |
| Sector — Communication | XLC | 0.74 | 1.05 | −1.91% | 0.86 | Avoid now |
| Sector — Industrials | XLI | 0.88 | 1.29 | −0.57% | 0.89 | Avoid now |
| Sector — Materials | XLB | 0.48 | 0.70 | −4.82% | 0.77 | Watch |
| Sector — Real Estate | XLRE | 0.50 | 0.71 | −0.49% | 0.52 | Watch |
| Sector — Health Care | XLV | 0.60 | 0.87 | +1.59% | 0.44 | Wanted — breadth 85, momentum +5.03% at 1 month |
Portfolios · The Optimal Portfolio & the Timeless program
Built by the analyst team. Every name chosen on research, tracked live from entry.
Please read: The Optimal Portfolio is a hypothetical model portfolio, entered at the Friday, October 23, 2026 close and tracked in the open from there. It does not reflect actual trading or any client’s results. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Performance: since inception · Oct 25, 2026: +0.13% as of indicative · October 27, 2026 3:30 PM ET · 15-min delayed · official at the close — price-only, dividends excluded, weights as published.
| Holding | Ticker | Class | Weight | Entry (Oct 23, 2026) | Intermediate | Long-term | Short-term | Role in the mix |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPDR Energy | XLE | Equity | 10% | 69.33 | UP +8.0% | UP +23.7% | UP +7.0% | The bet — the shock’s earnings stream; strongest long-term cushion in the sleeve |
| SPDR Health Care | XLV | Equity | 8% | 179.28 | UP +7.9% | UP +14.9% | UP +4.3% | Defensive growth — participates without the beta |
| SPDR S&P 500 | SPY | Equity | 8% | 759.97 | UP +3.8% | UP +5.9% | DOWN −1.3% | Core market exposure, sized down into a binary week |
| Schwab Dividend | SCHD | Equity | 7% | 35.27 | UP +4.6% | UP +12.9% | UP +5.3% | Equity ballast — dividend income, beta 0.52 |
| SPDR Staples | XLP | Equity | 6% | 88.26 | UP +1.0% | UP +7.1% | UP +5.2% | Lowest-beta equity (0.19); Quad 3 ballast |
| SPDR Technology | XLK | Equity | 4% | 183.23 | UP +7.0% | UP +10.7% | DOWN −5.4% | Growth toehold — sized small while its short term is broken |
| Nasdaq 100 | QQQ | Equity | 3% | 704.40 | UP +3.9% | UP +5.2% | DOWN −4.4% | Mega-cap growth toehold |
| 1–3Y Treasury | SHY | Bond | 14% | 81.50 | UP +0.2% | UP +0.6% | UP +0.4% | Primary ballast — front-end yield without duration risk |
| AAA CLO | JAAA | Bond | 12% | 50.61 | UP +1.0% | UP +2.0% | UP +0.2% | Floating-rate ballast-plus — 1-year max drawdown −0.4% |
| US Copper Index | CPER | Alternative | 6% | 39.06 | UP +3.6% | UP +4.1% | DOWN −2.2% | The only metal the gate admits — grid and AI-power demand |
| Broad Commodities | DBC | Alternative | 3% | 34.10 | UP +7.1% | UP +21.3% | UP +3.4% | Inflation-shock hedge |
| Bitcoin ETF | IBIT | Alternative | 2% | 45.96 | UP +9.7% | UP +9.8% | DOWN −2.8% | Satellite only — capped hard by the drawdown discipline |
| T-Bills 0–3M | SGOV | Cash | 17% | — | Exempt | Exempt | UP | The November fund — ~4.7% carry while the team waits |
Intermediate: 50-day average vs 150-day average (gap shown). Long-term: entry close vs its 10-month average. Short-term: close vs its 25-day average. Every non-cash holding passes the gate on computed figures, October 23, 2026. Gold, long-duration Treasuries and the team’s core income funds are all excluded this month — each fails at least one trend test, and the gate does not make exceptions.
Follow along: the monthly Optimal Portfolio report and its episode of The Heat Map podcast carry every change, the CIO’s vote and the reasoning. Tactical trading lives separately, on the Trading tab.
Portfolios · The Timeless program
Please read: Timeless portfolios are hypothetical model portfolios tracked live from October 23, 2026. Returns are equal-weighted and price-only (dividends excluded; no fees, taxes, or slippage). They do not reflect actual trading or any client’s results. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Long-term: price above its 10-month average. Intermediate: the 50-day average above the 150-day average. Short-term: price above its 25-day average. Percentages use the names with enough price history at each horizon — 109 of the 110 unique names (Universal Music Group excluded, as everywhere on this page).
| Sector / portfolio | Direction | Long-term % up | Intermediate % up | Short-term % up | Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All Timeless names (110 unique) | Improving | 70% | 59% | 62% | 109 |
| Timeless 25 | Improving | 60% | 44% | 60% | 25 |
| Consumer Staples — Stan | Improving | 100% | 70% | 100% | 10 |
| Utilities — Uma | Improving | 40% | 10% | 80% | 10 |
| Financials — Frank | Improving | 100% | 90% | 80% | 10 |
| Consumer Discretionary — Dana | Improving | 50% | 40% | 60% | 10 |
| Real Estate — Rosa | Improving | 50% | 30% | 40% | 10 |
| Communication Services — Carl | Improving | 33% | 33% | 22% | 9 |
| Energy — Ethan | Improving | 100% | 90% | 100% | 10 |
| Health Care — Hannah | Neutral | 90% | 80% | 90% | 10 |
| Materials — Matt | Neutral | 90% | 90% | 40% | 10 |
| Technology — Tom | Getting worse | 80% | 80% | 40% | 10 |
| Industrials — Ivan | Getting worse | 30% | 40% | 30% | 10 |
| Ticker | Company | Country | Entry price | Current price | Since inception · Oct 23, 2026 | Weight | Trend | Long-term | Intermediate | Short-term |
|---|
Smart Beta · Rules-based portfolios on the 300-brand universe
Built by rules, not opinions. Nine formulas run over the 300-brand universe — nobody picks these names.
Current prices and since-entry returns below are as of indicative · October 27, 2026 3:30 PM ET · 15-min delayed · official at the close (price-only, local currency).
Please read: These are hypothetical model portfolios, entered at the Thursday, October 22, 2026 close and tracked from there. Entry prices are the listing’s local-currency close — the currency is shown next to every price. Operating metrics are from Fiscal.ai, pulled October 24, 2026, stated as Fiscal.ai reports them; they have not been checked against company filings, and each row shows its own metric period. *Forward revenue growth is a calculated figure — Fiscal.ai’s next-fiscal-year revenue estimate against the last reported year — not a Fiscal.ai field. Blank cells mean the data is not available, never zero. These portfolios do not reflect actual trading or any client’s results. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
| Model | Concept | Versions |
|---|---|---|
| Momentum Leaders | The strongest 12-1 month risk-adjusted momentum in the index, on S&P 500 Momentum (SPMO) rules. | 25 + 10 |
| Quality Leaders | The index's highest profitability, efficiency and cash-flow ranks, on Northern Trust Quality (QLC) rules. | 25 + 10 |
| Value Leaders | The cheapest names on sector-relative earnings yield, book-to-price and cash-flow-to-EV, on MSCI Enhanced Value (VLUE) rules. | 25 + 10 |
| Cash Flow Aristocrats | Non-financials with the highest free-cash-flow yields, plus quality and FCF-growth factors, on COWZ-style rules. | 25 + 10 |
| Dividend Leaders | US dividend payers whose free cash flow covers the dividend plus net debt repayment, on a 50/50 SCHD/LVHD blend. | 25 + 10 |
| Dividend Growth Leaders | US companies with 10+ straight years of dividend increases, top yielders excluded, on VIG rules. | 25 + 10 |
| International Dividend Leaders | Non-US dividend payers ranked on volatility-adjusted yield, on LVHI-style rules, unhedged. | 25 + 10 |
| Risk-On | The highest downside beta, cyclicality and momentum in smaller names — built to track risk appetite. | 25 + 10 |
| Risk-Off | The lowest downside beta and the most defensive mix in larger names — Risk-On's mirror image. | 25 + 10 |
Source: model construction and Fiscal.ai operating metrics, export of October 24, 2026; entry prices October 22, 2026 close, local currency. Models rebalance every 90 days on data cuts at the end of January, April, July and October. For informational purposes only. This is not financial advice. Please do your own research.
Fixed Income · Bill’s desk
59 / 100 · Neutral — at the top of the band. This market’s offer is two offers stapled together: one generous, one insulting.
| Risk-free yield | 82 | The risk-free rate pays you to wait — bills and the belly yield 4.2 to 5.0% with no credit risk. | |
| Securitized & floating carry | 74 | Agency mortgages and AAA CLOs are the best risk-adjusted carry on the board. | |
| Inflation protection | 64 | Breakevens still price a world where the oil shock fades — protection is not expensive. | |
| Duration value | 52 | Fairly paid in the belly, hostage-priced at the long end — buyable in stages, not in lunges. | |
| Credit compensation | 28 | High yield at a 3.40% spread is a benign-world price for a Quad 4 world. The insulting half of the offer. |
| Instrument | Yield / spread | Desk note |
|---|---|---|
| Fed funds target | 3.75–4.00% | After the September 2026 hike. December language is the next trigger. |
| 3-month bill | 4.22% | Cash is a position, not an accident. |
| 2-year Treasury | 4.71% | Prices a Fed that is not done. |
| Belly (3–10 yr) | 4.82–4.89% | The perch: nearly the 10-year’s yield at half the term-premium exposure. |
| 10-year Treasury | 4.99% | Tripwires both ways: 5.40% extends duration, 4.40% harvests it. |
| 30-year Treasury | 5.30% | Term premium ~1.1 — the long end is paid, but the marginal buyer is price-sensitive. |
| Curve (2s10s) | +28 bp | Steepening led by the long end — a supply and term-premium story, not a growth story. |
| High yield spread (OAS) | 3.37% | Cycle-stingy. No broad high yield at this price — the Hybrid book holds only a 5% short-duration quality sleeve (SHYG). |
Yields: U.S. Treasury, October 26, 2026 close (3-month bill and belly: October 23, 2026). High yield spread: ~3.37%, October 26, 2026. This board refreshes with the site’s market updates.
How to read this:
Performance: since inception · Oct 27, 2026: 0.00% as of indicative · October 27, 2026 3:30 PM ET · 15-min delayed · official at the close — price-only; bond funds pay income the price return does not capture.
| Sleeve | Position | Vehicle | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core — go-anywhere active | BlackRock Flexible Income | BINC | 30% |
| Eaton Vance Income Opportunities | XAGG | 15% | |
| Carry & front end | AAA CLOs (floating rate) | JAAA | 15% |
| Short-duration high yield (quality) | SHYG | 5% | |
| Duration | Long Treasuries | TLT | 10% |
| Low-vol dividend equities | Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity | SCHD | 15% |
| Franklin Low Volatility High Dividend | LVHD | 10% | |
| Avoided today | Broad high yield · bank loans · convertibles · preferreds | — | 0% |
| On watch | PIMCO Multisector Bond Active | PYLD | — |
The framework build (October 27, 2026):
Hypothetical model portfolio; it does not reflect actual trading or any client’s results.
| Sleeve | Position | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Ladder core | Treasury iBonds rungs 2027–2031 (IBTH · IBTI · IBTK) | 40% |
| Investment-grade corporate iBonds rungs 2027–2031 (IBDS · IBDT · IBDU · IBDV) | 30% | |
| Satellites | TIPS iBonds (IBIF, Oct 2029) — certainty in real terms | 10% |
| AAA CLOs, floating rate (JAAA) | 10% | |
| Bills & short Treasuries (SGOV) — the liquidity sleeve | 10% |
Rules:
Hypothetical model portfolio; it does not reflect actual trading or any client’s results.
| HY OAS at 5.00% |
|
| 10-year at 5.40% |
|
| 10-year at 4.40% |
|
| SHYG kill switch (two-key) |
|
| December FOMC |
|
| Name | The credit tape | Read |
|---|---|---|
| CoreWeave | 5-yr CDS ~1,090 bp · bonds 75–83¢ at 15–16.5% | The equity story says sub-one-year paybacks; the bond market charges distressed prices. Both cannot be right. |
| Oracle | CDS ~322 bp, +178 bp this year | Downgraded to BBB− in July. The AI trade’s weakest investment-grade link. |
| Meta | 5-yr CDS at a record 114.5 bp (Oct 22) | A fortress balance sheet crossing 100 bp is a regime signal, not a Meta problem. |
| NVIDIA | CDS 101–126 bp at records | Even the tollbooth pays more for protection than it ever has. |
| The system | CDX IG ~60–62 bp · HY OAS 3.40% · fortress cash above $500B | Stress is name-specific, not systemic — yet. Bill’s flip rule: any three of his seven warning signs, or the fortress names cracking together. |
Single-name CDS levels are largely paid-tier data; unsourceable levels are labeled as bond-spread proxies and nothing is estimated. For informational purposes only. This is not financial advice. Please do your own research.
Digital Assets · Nolan’s desk
How to read the line:
52 / 100 · Neutral — the Digital Assets complex, inaugural board, October 27, 2026.
| Bitcoin | 58 | Strongest structure of the three: +9.4% over its 10-month line at the inaugural close, dominance 59.4%, the treasury bid intact. Held back by the short-term break and October ETF selling. | |
| Ethereum | 45 | Weakest of the three: thinnest cushion over its line (+4.7%), four straight weeks of spot ETF outflows — while its treasury companies accumulate and stake at scale. | |
| Solana | 48 | The highest-beta major: deepest cycle drawdown (−79.5%), sharpest October leg (−20.7%), smallest and most fragile treasury complex. |
The desk’s first report, October 27, 2026: the correction measured properly — peak, trough, and which trend lines held — the treasury companies at a discount, and the CLARITY Act’s real status. Hear it on The Heat Map show feed, and find every episode on the Podcasts tab.
| Company | Coin | Coins held | Approx. value | mNAV | Desk note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strategy (MSTR) | BTC | 848,517 | ~$67.9B | 0.89× | The anchor: ~4.0% of all Bitcoin. Average cost ~$75,446. Last buy 267 BTC on October 25 — at a discount to NAV, issuing equity to buy coins destroys the per-share math, so the buys have shrunk to token size. Enterprise mNAV is 1.16× including debt and preferreds. |
| Metaplanet (3350.T) | BTC | 44,000 | ~$3.5B | 0.59× | The cautionary tale: average cost ~$98,454 is underwater, and October’s ¥52B convertible issue went to repaying BTC-backed loans and buying back shares — deleveraging, not accumulating. |
| Twenty One (XXI) | BTC | 43,514 | ~$3.5B | 0.55× | No accumulation since its December 2025 listing. Tether/iFinex hold 58.8% of the equity and 71% of the vote — the discount here is governance as much as Bitcoin. |
| Strive (ASST) | BTC | 43,000 | ~$3.4B | 1.04× | The exception: +6,182 BTC in the week to October 26 — the week’s only big buyer, and the only top name still at a premium. The one flywheel that still turns. |
| MARA (MARA) | BTC | 35,577 | ~$2.8B | 0.93× | Sold 15,133 BTC in March 2026 to service debt — the miner-treasury that already showed what a discount regime forces. |
| BitMine (BMNR) | ETH | 6,051,933 | ~$14.3B | 0.43× | The Ethereum treasury company of record: 4.95% of all ETH, 99% of the way to its stated 5% goal, ~5.23M ETH staked. Chairman Tom Lee of Fundstrat is the key person to follow on this name — his public calls are standing desk intake. Last week it spent $45.9M buying back its own shares against $24.6M of ETH: at 0.43×, the cheapest ETH it can buy is its own stock. |
| SharpLink (SBET) | ETH | 868,699 | ~$2.0B | 0.74× | The number-two ETH treasury, staking-led, at a discount like the rest of the complex. |
| Ether Machine (via DYNX) | ETH | 496,712 | ~$1.2B | 0.15× | The deepest discount in the complex — a pending-combination vehicle priced as an option, not a treasury. |
| Forward Industries (FWDI) | SOL | 8,501,298 | ~$859M | UNKNOWN | The largest SOL treasury, as of September 30, 2026 (fiscal Q4 release, October 1): +948,601 SOL in the quarter. |
| DeFi Development (DFDV) | SOL | ~2.39M | ~$241M | UNKNOWN | September 14, 2026 disclosure. Launched a $300M preferred program and a SOL-backed credit initiative in September. |
| Upexi (UPXI) | SOL | 2,340,000 | ~$236M | UNKNOWN | Tracker figure. Acquired its SOL at ~$325M of cost — underwater at today’s price. |
| Solana Company (HSDT) | SOL | 2,300,000 | ~$232M | UNKNOWN | Tracker figure. Cost ~$455M — deeply underwater; the fragile end of the smallest complex. |
Sources: Bittery leaderboard (October 26, 2026), company filings and releases (BitMine 8-K, October 26, 2026), The Block Ethereum treasury tracker (October 25–26, 2026), filings-based SOL figures as dated in the notes. SOL mNAV by company is not yet sourceable on a like-for-like basis — it is labeled UNKNOWN, never estimated. Values use reference prices near $80K BTC / $2,356 ETH / $101 SOL at the as-of dates.
The desk’s read (DWF Labs, October 2026):
Source: Farside Investors via Cointelegraph, October 24–26, 2026; Friday figures provisional at publication.
| Friday, October 30 — month-end closes | The inaugural board’s first adjudication: Bitcoin vs its ~$73.5K line, Ethereum vs ~$2,232, Solana vs ~$93.00, at the October close. |
| ETF flows, daily | Whether Bitcoin’s late-week selling runs into a second week — and whether Ethereum’s four-week outflow streak breaks. |
| Treasury mNAV, weekly | Strategy’s gross mNAV vs 1.0×; BitMine vs 0.43×. Any name issuing equity at a premium again is the flywheel returning — the desk’s earliest all-clear. |
| The regulatory file | The CLARITY Act failed its Senate cloture vote on September 15, 2026 (49–50) and expires with this Congress on January 3, 2027 — JPMorgan sees a possible 2027 return, not a 2026 one. What advances instead: the SEC/CFTC March 2026 joint interpretation (BTC, ETH and SOL classified as digital commodities), the CFTC’s comment window on leveraged retail crypto (open to December 14, 2026), and GENIUS Act stablecoin rules effective by January 18, 2027. |
Market structure at the inaugural board: Bitcoin dominance 59.4% of a $2.71T total crypto market; Crypto Fear & Greed at 50 — Neutral (CoinGecko, Cointelegraph, October 26–27, 2026). For informational purposes only. This is not financial advice. Please do your own research.
Trading · Fast Twitch
Please read: Fast Twitch is a hypothetical model trading portfolio, tracked in the open from October 25, 2026. It does not reflect actual trading or any client’s results. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
| Ticker | Name | Entry · Oct 26 close | Shares | Position value | Trigger at entry |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBRE | CBRE Group | $122.88 | 1,356.33 | $166,665.83 | RSI 34.8 vs 33.2 at the prior low · MACD −2.65 vs −4.13 · 28.4% below its 52-week high |
| MELI | MercadoLibre | $1,668.72 | 99.87 | $166,655.07 | RSI 32.5 vs 31.3 · MACD −12.49 vs −48.27 — the strongest divergence of the three · 29.3% below its 52-week high |
| NFLX | Netflix | $63.90 | 2,608.24 | $166,666.54 | RSI 33.5 vs 31.1 · MACD −1.98 vs −2.51 · 44.8% below its 52-week high |
Deployed: $499,987.44 in equal thirds. Cash reserve: $500,012.56 — held back for future capitulation triggers.
Scan method: daily adjusted closes; RSI(14) Wilder; MACD line (12, 26); divergence measured in 10-trading-day blocks against the prior block’s low — the team’s standing divergence definition. All positions are hypothetical paper trades at official session closes.
Open and closed trades will be listed here with entry and exit prices, dates and the logged exit plan, as they occur.
For informational purposes only. This is not financial advice. Please do your own research.
300 Index · Track the universe
A well-researched 300-stock list of leading companies tied to the global consumption theme across consumer spending, business spending, and government spending.
Long-term: price above its 10-month average. Intermediate: the 50-day average above the 150-day average. Short-term: price above its 25-day average. Percentages use the names with enough price history at each horizon — 296 of 300 long-term and intermediate, all 300 short-term.
| Sector | Direction | Long-term % up | Intermediate % up | Short-term % up | Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All 300 names | Improving | 52% | 53% | 63% | 296 |
| Materials | Improving | 100% | 100% | 100% | 2 |
| Energy | Improving | 90% | 80% | 100% | 10 |
| Consumer Staples | Improving | 71% | 61% | 97% | 31 |
| Health Care | Improving | 73% | 65% | 85% | 26 |
| Real Estate | Improving | 57% | 29% | 71% | 7 |
| Information Technology | Getting worse | 73% | 76% | 46% | 37 |
| Financials | Improving | 57% | 78% | 57% | 37 |
| Consumer Discretionary | Improving | 36% | 39% | 64% | 83 |
| Utilities | Improving | 20% | 0% | 40% | 5 |
| Communication Services | Neutral | 29% | 38% | 32% | 21 |
| Industrials | Neutral | 35% | 35% | 49% | 37 |
| Ticker | Name | Sector | Price | 1 Week | 1 Month | 3 Months | 6 Months | 12 Months | Trend | Long-term | Intermediate | Short-term |
|---|
Podcasts · The Heat Map show
Every episode leads with its subject, so you can scan and pick your topic. The show is live on Spotify, and you can subscribe in any podcast app with the RSS feed.
Weekly Briefs · The CIO summary
After Friday’s close, every desk’s observations flow up to the CIO and are consolidated into one weekly summary. This is the archive, newest first.
The Team · Hierarchy & coverage
The Heat Map is produced by a named team with a clear chain of command — a human CIO at the top, a team leader running the desks day to day, and a specialist accountable for every sector and every market lens the board tracks.
The CIO sets the verdict, owns the portfolios and the track record, and has the final say on everything the team publishes.
Runs the team day to day: coordinates the desks and specialists, consolidates their work into the weekly CIO summary, and keeps the scoreboard, portfolios and episodes on schedule.
The quad framework: where the economy is, where it is headed, and what wins and loses in each regime.
Owns every fixed-income call: which bond asset classes to own, and through which ETFs. The bond market is the smart market — Bill’s read factors into every CIO synthesis.
Trend, breadth and internals across long, intermediate and short timeframes — price leads fundamentals.
What the market is rewarding: size, growth versus value, momentum, quality, US versus non-US.
Commodities and hard assets — gold, energy and the physical side of the market.
The short-term lens: options gamma positioning, fast-money favorites and trading setups.
What consumers and trading communities are hot and cold on — buzz as a leading indicator.
Bitcoin, Ethereum and Solana against the 10-month line, the crypto treasury companies and their premiums, spot ETF flows, and the regulatory file led by the CLARITY Act.
Elections worldwide and their market effects, the US political situation and the midterm power dynamic, tariffs, and the live bill tracker — the CLARITY Act’s afterlife included. Grant owns the team’s Geopolitics rating.
Political / geopolitical light: YELLOW — Cautious
Turns the macro view, the technicals and the desks’ work into allocations — and co-builds the Timeless 25 with the CIO.
Builds the messaging: how the team’s markets work and portfolios reach clients and investors, clearly and on time.
Disclosures
What The Heat Map is, what it is not, and the basis on which everything here — scores, portfolios and track record included — should be read.
The Heat Map is published for educational and informational purposes only. Nothing on this site is financial advice, and nothing here is a recommendation or an offer to buy, sell, or hold any security or to adopt any investment strategy. The content is general in nature: it is not tailored to any individual reader’s financial situation, objectives, or needs, and it does not take your circumstances into account. Before making any investment decision, do your own research and consult a licensed financial advisor who knows your situation.
The Heat Map is not a registered investment adviser. It is not affiliated with any registered investment adviser, broker-dealer, or investment fund, and it does not manage money for anyone. Visiting this site, reading its content, listening to its podcasts, or joining its email list does not create an advisory, fiduciary, or client relationship of any kind. The Heat Map is an educational project: a public test of what an AI analyst team can do for financial research and investing education. Its purpose is to give readers one place to follow updated market information, so that they can make their own decisions.
The Heat Map is produced by an AI analyst team working under human direction. The views expressed are the team’s opinions as of the date shown on each page, report, or episode, and they are subject to change without notice as market conditions and the underlying data change. Information is drawn from sources the team believes to be reliable, but accuracy and completeness are not guaranteed. The team has no obligation to update any score, report, or opinion after its publication date, except as part of its regular weekly and quarterly cycles.
All content on this site is generated by AI systems working under human direction. AI-generated research can contain errors — including incorrect figures — even when it reads with confidence. Any figure that matters to a decision should be verified against primary sources before it is relied on.
Every portfolio shown on this site is a hypothetical model portfolio — the Timeless 10 lists and the Timeless 25 (tracked live from October 23, 2026), the Optimal Portfolio (from October 25, 2026), the rule-based models on the Smart Beta page, the Hybrid Income model and the Safety & Certainty ladder model (both from October 27, 2026 in their current form), and the Trading Portfolio (from October 26, 2026). None of them is an actual trading account, and none represents the results of any client or investor. Nothing is backtested in the live track records, and no performance is shown for any period before each portfolio’s start date; the one historical lookback shown is labeled a hypothetical backtest wherever it appears. Returns are price-return only: dividends are excluded. Returns reflect no commissions, fees, taxes, or slippage. An actual account would incur some or all of these, and its results would differ. Holdings, entry prices, and every change are disclosed in full on the site as they occur.
Past performance is not indicative of future results. All investing involves substantial risk, including the possible loss of all capital invested. Forward-looking statements — including views on the direction of markets, economic regimes, interest rates, and individual companies — are opinions only; they are not guarantees, predictions of fact, or promises of future performance, and actual outcomes may differ materially.
The Heat Map is an independent research publication. It is not a fund, and nothing on this site is an offer for any fund or ETF or constitutes fund marketing material. References to companies and securities are research opinions of the analyst team only.
You are responsible for your own investment decisions. Verify any figure that matters to you against primary sources, consider your own objectives and risk tolerance, and consult a licensed financial advisor before acting. By using this site you acknowledge that The Heat Map is an educational publication and not a substitute for professional advice tailored to you.
The Heat Map keeps growing — new portfolios and new models are being added all the time. Join the list and we’ll email you what’s new: portfolio and model launches, major updates, and the week’s highlights. Information and updates only — unsubscribe anytime.